post publication peer review in iranian biomedical journals

نویسندگان

ali ghanbari

seyed-alireza derakhshan rad

چکیده

background: letters to the editor provide an opportunity for readers to state their views about published articles. research on this issue has been mainly on western journals and there is no study on the iranian journals. the present study aimed to investigate this subject in iranian biomedical journals. materials and method: this was a bibliometric study. the databases of iran medex, medlib, and sid were searched to find the letters published in iranian biomedical journals. the letters in formats such as commentaries, concise articles, and the preliminary results of studies or brief reports were excluded from the study. results: 184 letters were found in iranian journals; 49 of them were responses of authors to the criticism made by readers. as a result, the number of letters that commented on or criticized the original articles reduced to 135. for every 1198 articles published in iranian journals, there is only one letter written in correspondence to published articles. 76% of letters published in 2010 to 2012. conclusions: the iranian readers are much less productive in writing letters to iranian biomedical journals compared to their peers in other places. the low number of letters could be attributed to several issues including a broad unawareness of the importance of the letters and little incentive for writing letter.the sharp rise in the number of letters after 2009 indicates a boosted motivation of iranians for writing more letters to the editor.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Debunking Post-Publication Peer Review

Science forms a fundamental core of many aspects of society. Many objects, functionalities, systems and processes are based on scientific principles and fundamentals. The latter two are often derived from scientific discovery which is traditionally built upon appropriate hypothesis testing, and exposed through published reports, in the form of scientific papers. Thus, any object or process that...

متن کامل

Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication.

Everyone has a stake in the quality of the biomedical literature. With that in mind, we announce our intention to hold the eighth international congress on peer review in biomedical publication on 10-12 September 2017, in Chicago, Illinois. As with the previous congresses, our aim will be to improve the quality and credibility of biomedical information and to help advance the efficiency, effect...

متن کامل

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals

Current scholarly publications heavily rely on high quality peer review. Peer review, albeit imperfect, is aimed at improving science writing and editing. Evidence supporting peer review as a guarantor of the quality of biomedical publications is currently lacking. Its outcomes are largely dependent on the credentials of the reviewers. Several lines of evidence suggest that predictors of the be...

متن کامل

publication rates of public health theses in international and national peer-review journals in turkey

background: thesis is an important part of specialisation and doctorate education and requires intense work. the aim of this study was to investigate the publication rates of turkish public health doctorate theses (phdt) and public health specialization (phst) theses in international and turkish national peer-review journals and to analyze the distribution of research areas. methods: list of al...

متن کامل

Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation

Conventional peer review: rights and wrongs Peer review is broken. We have all heard that phrase many times in recent years. It’s become a truism, a shorthand complaint about the status quo that rarely extends into a proposal for change. And even those who do not believe standard peer review is beyond repair acknowledge that there are problems; everyone can see the cracks. So what’s wrong? From...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
galen medical journal

جلد ۴، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱-۷

کلمات کلیدی

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023